Evaluation of classmates Juno Opening

Group	How was the Use of camera shots?	Use of editing?	Use of lighting?	Overall Success of video
James C ,Becky and Emma	It was very shaky. All the shots were fairly accurate but they had some delay.	The colours looked exaggerated and vibrant which looked good but wasn’t like the original.	It was very bright but sometimes too bright as you couldn’t see fine details like the face.	I thought it looked good but wasn’t much like the original. I think some effects looked good but it wasn’t accurate.
Dom and Lara	The camera was very shaky and it kept cutting out Juno. Some were in the original and some were not which means it wasn’t very accurate.	The editing was done well as it looked slightly like a cartoon which is like the original. The transition from no effect to an effect was done very well at the right time.	The lighting was just right and almost the same as the original.	It was very shaky and the timing was slightly off but apart from that it was good.
George, Kaitlyn and Sarah	I thought all of the camera shots were very smooth which is very good. It looked very professional. It was very much like the original	The transitions looked very good and fitted in very well. It looked slightly cartoony but it was slightly hard to notice.	The lighting was perfect and just like the original. None of it was too bright or too dark.	I think the video was very good as it was smooth and the editing was very good. The lighting was perfect and the timing was almost spot on.
James B and Megan	I thought the camera shots were accurate to what were in the original and they were only slightly shaky in places.	The transitions were the only effects I noticed. The transitions fitted well with the original and were very smooth. They didn’t feel forced.	The lighting was good and none of it was too dark or too bright.	I think it was good as the camera shots were good and it was very close to the original. I think some effects to make it look cartoony would have helped made it look better.